Presents: ObjectRoleModeling.com Friday, March 12, 2010
  Search
Register Login
Web Log
 
 
  Web Log Entries  
 

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Wrap-up Read More...

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Day Two, More on Yukon Read More...

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Day Two, Yukon will rock Read More...

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Day Two, Data keynote Read More...

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Day Two, Whidbey keynote Read More...

Microsoft Professional Developers Conference 2003: Day One Read More...

Sometimes you may not always spot a fact type that is a candidate for nesting/co-referencing and will instead model it as a ternary or higher arity fact type (the relationship between these schema patterns is covered here). As you add facts, you may notice that some groupings of facts have similar patterns with their related object types. Read More...

We’ll look at a more trivial transformation: transforming multiple unary facts into higher arity schema fragments. Read More...

It is occasionally a system requirement to allow for the recording of history about a particular fact. Borrowing a bit from a newsgroup post I recently answered, I'd like to talk a bit about adding temporal facts to an ORM schema. Read More...

Surrogate keys can be implemented in ORM by merely using a surrogate object and fact. Read More...

One of the more subtle ORM schema transformations is the relationship between ternary fact types, nested binary facts with a functional role, and co-referenced object types with a functional role. Read More...


Bookmark and Share
 

Note: To comment on a blog post, you must be logged in.

  Search Web Log  
 
 
  Subscribe Minimize  
 
Subscribe
 
  Categories  
   
  Archive  
   
  Blog Roll  
   
  Syndication  
   
 
© 2003 - 2009 Orthogonal Software Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms Of Use Privacy Statement